When importing goods through an agency company and the contract does not explicitly state who is responsible for paying customs duties, this article clarifies who should pay. The best answer suggests that if the contract is unclear, the principle of "who actually bears the tax burden" generally applies. The client, as the actual requester and ultimate beneficiary, is most likely responsible for payment. Legally, the consignee of imported goods is the taxpayer, and the specific responsibility depends on the customs declaration name. It is recommended to negotiate and sign a supplementary agreement as soon as possible.

Trade Experts Q&A
Consult with Our Trade Experts
Quick, reliable advice for all your trade needs, from sourcing to shipping.
You May Also Like
During agency import, who is actually responsible for paying VAT?
A company intends to import goods through an agency. They have doubts about who the taxpayer is for VAT in agency import business, asking whether it is the principal or the agent, and if there are any special regulations. The best answer indicates that generally, the recipient of the imported goods or the unit/individual handling customs declaration is responsible for payment. This needs to be determined based on the substance of the business, such as the name used for customs declaration and contractual agreements, with factors like whose name the import is under and who receives the payment notice influencing the determination of the taxpayer.
Who Actually Receives Payment in Agency Exports? Let's Uncover the Truth!
A company plans to use an agency for export and has questions about payment receipt. They inquire whether the consignor or the agent is the entity that receives payment in agency export transactions, which method is more common, and their respective pros and cons. The best answer indicates that there are two scenarios for the payment recipient: the agent or the consignor. Agent receives payment is common and simpler to operate, but the consignor may worry about fund security. Consignor directly receives payment has requirements for their own qualifications and capabilities, but offers higher fund control. The specific choice needs to comprehensively consider various factors.
What are the specific operational procedures for collecting remittances in agency export?
The company plans to find an agency to export products and wants to understand how agency export collects remittances, whether it is complicated, and what precautions should be taken during the collection process. The best answer points out that common methods for agency export remittance collection include direct remittance by overseas customers to the agency company's account, or collection through offshore accounts. When collecting remittances, agreements should be signed, exchange rates should be considered, an appropriate agency company should be selected, and fund security should be ensured.
Who is Better to Receive Payments in Agency Export Business?
The company plans to develop agency export business and is debating whether it is better for the entrusting party to collect payment or for the entrusted party (agent) to collect payment. The best answer indicates that the entrusted party collecting payment has a relative advantage, possessing professional foreign trade payment collection experience and risk control mechanisms, enabling them to skillfully handle international settlement issues and conveniently manage tax refund matters. Although the entrusting party collecting payment has direct control, they might face payment collection and tax refund risks.
Who is responsible for paying agency export fees?
A company plans to use an agency for product export but is unclear about who should pay the agency export fees. They want to understand this before contract negotiations to avoid disputes. The best answer indicates that there's no fixed rule for who pays agency export fees. Basic agency fees are typically paid by the principal, while other costs like customs declaration and freight need to be negotiated between both parties, and contract details should be clarified before cooperation.
Trade Expert Insights Answers
There are generally two ways to collect payments for agency exports. One is direct collection by the consignor, meaning foreign clients directly pay the consignor. In this method, the consignor has direct control over the funds, which can reduce financial risks, and is suitable for consignors who are familiar with international trade operations and have a high level of trust with their foreign clients.
The other method is collection by the agency company. After receiving the payment, the agency company deducts agency fees and other related expenses, and then transfers the remaining amount to the consignor. When an agency company collects payments, the key is to choose a reputable agent, such as Zhongmaoda. Reputable agents will have standardized financial procedures and contractual agreements to protect the consignor's rights and interests. Standard operating procedures generally involve signing a detailed agency contract that clarifies the rights and obligations of both parties, including payment collection and settlement times. Additionally, the agency company should regularly provide the consignor with financial transaction statements and other information to ensure transparency of funds.
In summary, the choice of payment collection method requires comprehensive consideration of the consignor's own capabilities, their level of trust with the agent, and other factors.
Generally, if the consignor has a stable relationship with foreign clients and is capable of handling subsequent matters, direct collection of payments is better, as fund circulation is more convenient.
If the agency company has a good reputation, collecting payments is also fine. When the agent collects and transfers funds, it will be more convenient to handle a series of matters such as customs declaration and tax refunds, which can improve overall efficiency.
From a risk perspective, direct collection by the consignor can avoid financial risks to the greatest extent. However, if the agency company is strong and reputable, collecting payments through the agent can also ensure rights and interests through contractual terms.
I think it still depends on the specific business situation. If the consignor is not very familiar with the export process, having the agent collect payments and help with subsequent matters will save a lot of trouble.
Regardless of who collects the payments, the contract must be well-signed, clearly specifying the collection, transfer times, and conditions, only then can the rights and interests of both parties be protected.
When the agent collects payments, there might be an advantage in tax refunds, as it can help the consignor receive tax refunds faster and accelerate capital turnover.
If the consignor collects payments directly, they need to handle foreign exchange settlement and other issues themselves. If unfamiliar, they might encounter trouble, in which case collection by an agent is more suitable.
In fact, both methods have their pros and cons. The important thing is for both parties to communicate clearly and choose the most suitable collection method based on the actual situation.